Emma Watson: check out http://emma-what-son.tumblr.com

Link: http://emma-what-son.tumblr.com/

This person, whoever it is, has taken over with the context of this blog. I came across this page when it popped up on my tumblr wall after it was posted by one of my followers. This is not me. I DO NOT run that tumble page. Some Emma loons think that it is, but it is not. I'm done with all of it, but I still think it is important that emma watson does not get away with her lying, hypocrisy and contradicting. I'm just advertising this page for that person. If I wanted to come back, and post I'd be posting here where I have over 1 million hits, and it's well known. I deleted letstalkaboutemmawatson.tumblr, so if I wanted I could have posted there as well. This blog is staying up for posterity reasons.

So go check out http://emma-what-son.tumblr.com/ if you need to fill the void this blog has left you.


 

Happy Christmas Emma Watson fans and non-Emma Watson fans

This blog is dead. I'm not coming back. I have no clue what is going on with Emma Watson from a professional, dating or pretty little liar stand point. I don't care. That moment in my life have passed. Today was the first day in over two months I googled anything on Emma. It was for shits and giggles but thankfully my giggles didn't make me shit. Call this boredom and a little bit of weird nostalgia at the moment. Looking back to the two years of this blog I call myself an idiot for wasting my time but it was what it was. I know I looked obsessed at times but you cannot refute the evidence and sources. I did not call her names outside of fake. I stuck to the facts as she put them out there. Empirical date and deductive reasoning goes along way. I looked at it like putting together a puzzle. I love sleuth and detective work. You're not always right but your not always completely wrong and I think I'm pretty damn close to winner winner chicken dinner if you get that slang. It was not that difficult to do actually and my posts took 10 to 15 minutes to construct if you knew where all the information was.

So I took to the net today as I just mentioned and I read some things and I was like, eh, same old little pretentious and ostentatious girl with her deceptions, hypocrisy and contradictions. Her fans still buy it and the casual readers do just the same. They are not putting two and two together because of ignorance (casual readers) and cognitive dissonance (emma loons). They are still making excuses for her out of the stupidest arguments. I did notice one quote recently from the PoBaWF promotion where she said she is a lot more honest now. Well well well I thought she was always honest and stayed true to herself like she preached? I still think the girl is a piece of work and one fake ass celebrity that either lives in her own head or is so choreographed and scripted she can't keep up with it all. Maybe it's a little bit of everything sprinkled here and there. She seems to be one complicated and confusing person. Maybe a little bi-polar with an identity complex. I don't know for sure but I've always had that idea about her with how much she flip and flops all the time. Well if it wasn't PR motivated all the time. Of which many signs point to her being a media whore.

Continuing this blog would have been like beating a dead horse. She will recycle lies and make new one up all for her image just so she can make some money and feed her huge ego thinking she's just like Audrey Hepburn. The girl has had everything handed to her. She famous, wealthy, pretty and white. She has the media and most onlookers wrapped around her pretty little lying finger. The girl next door look can do that. If she looked like Kelly Osborne she'd be called out but since she is truly a lovely looking lady she gets a pass. But anyway she still finds things to whine like she's lived this stunted unfulfilled life. When it comes down to it Emma is a overly privileged girl from a modest middle class family that never had to struggle her entire life for anything and became even luckier when she was chosen to be in Harry Potter. But still she is woe is me Watson. I always found that annoying and it was even worse when I caught her in deceptions, contradiction and hypocrisy. It was a slap in the face to hard working people everywhere. If it were not for that I would have not cared. I would have been like 'good for her' with a smile. I used to when I was dumb about her but once I started reading and paying attention that smile turned upside down.

Finally to end my little stroll down why the hell did I ever care lane I also went to the some old Emma Watson forums and websites to read how obsessed her fans still are. I'm sorry but I couldn't live like that or continue on and on like it was breathing. I never quite grasped the god like admiration people put on celebrities. You guys truly do. The stalking, posting of private pictures and downright vicious of their fans in the defense of one. You might as well erect statues and places of worship to them. You make them out to be this golden calf like the fictional story of Moses and the ten commandments. If you studied psychology, anthropology and theology you'd see the connection and you'd understand my point with this. You buy into the hype, movie magic and physical and commerical attraction of these people. However you called people like me obsessed and crazy for pointing out the smoke and mirrors of it all. And many of you are still going strong with it months after I threw in the towel. So what's that say about me and what does that say about you? I don't need golden calves to live my life or need anyone to look up too. I just need books to read and things to learn and that will never stop but this blog has.

Ahhhh closure....

Anyway Happy Christmas to you all, goodbye and good luck =)
 

Let’s talk about Emma Watson

I have not had the urge until now to blog. A lot of that was because of her Glamour and t-magazine, lies, hypocrisy and contradictions. It actually turned me off from continuing. The girl gets away with it. It's an endless cycle of let's ignore her bullshit but praise her. I started getting a real bad itch last night. I heard quote from a radio interview (posted on youtube) where she said Perks made her do all these things she was uncomfortable with. I sat there in amazement because she read the script and book before the movie. She knew what she was getting into. She wanted Perks for the reason of separating herself from the Hermione role. She does have a lot of nerve to talk how she does with always making herself out as an innocent victim. She knew exactly what she was doing and wants risque roles. To lie like this is despicable. That's what started the itch. I wasn't even searching for anything on her. It came up on my youtube and curious me clicked to see what was going on.

To set things straight the Lets talk about Emma Watson tumblr was me. I stopped that when I stopped doing this blog over a month ago. I did that as an experiment. I posted regular photos of Emma but placed her contradictions, hypocrisy and deceptions quotes below to see what response I would get. People were confused if I liked her or not but loved the photos. I still got a lot of hate for it even though I did no respond like I normally do with all the "echee says" lingo. I stuck to what she said and that's all. People are blinded by her looks to the point they can't see what's wrong with her. I've said that time and time again. I've accepted it is what it is because those people will never be torn away from their trance. Beauty forgives all transgressions and flaws that other people would not be forgiven for. Not many of us can look past what someone looks like.

On another note it's been over a month since I came to this blog or really read anything on her other than what I said above regarding youtube. I am out of the loop. I don't know where to start. That's a discouragement in itself to continue. Maybe someone can tell me what's been going on. However I don't know if I will keep on going. Maybe this post will restart the blog. I have to admit I don't feel the same way I did before. I used to have feelings of strong annoyance towards her. Now it's nothing but thoughts. I had a lot of time to put in real thought outside this blog. I completely separated myself from what I was doing here. Maybe that's a good thing because that annoyance clouded some things. I do feel the same way when it comes to her being fake and living in her own head but in a weird way I feel sorry for her. Not because she's a victim. She's someone who needs to be disingenuous to be liked. Outside her looks there is nothing special about her. For celebrity standards she's a dud. She's lucky she was part of Harry Potter and had the role she did. It's not because of the pressure of being a celebrity or anything remotely close to that example. Emma is that girl that has been handed everything but unfortunately lacks the personality and character to respect, appreciate and have perspective about it.

When I came back I lost the fervour to do this blog. Now I don't know how I feel about doing it. I kind of want to but then I kind of don't. I don't hate Emma or am I jealous. The evidence I've placed speak for themselves. The girl is fake and full of herself. She has everything one could ever want but she chooses to lie, contradict and be a hypocrite. It's all on purpose. It's for her image. These are not honest mistakes. We all have degrees of honest contradiction or hypocrisy which is natural but she plays these angles. She plays the fame game. Anyone with an open mind can tell she's not being honest. Though not everyone is a liar to the degree she is. We all have lied about something but how many of us has lied about who we are as person? That's what gets me about her. We all have flaws but she has enough of these moments where you can tell she's like this on purpose. She's simply not an honest celebrity. As I've stated before this blog is about her celebrity side but now I have a strong suspicion this trait of deception is also within her personal life. I don't think Emma the celebrity is much different than Emma the private person.

Today was the first day I wanted to sign on. I had a nice holiday/vacation. I originally said I wouldn't be back for a week but it ended up pulling me away from this blog for over a month. I had great moments of clarity under the back drop of the luminous night sky. The separation of human from technology is glorious. Technology destroys the person's spiritual ability to see the world as something different than they are accustomed to. Sitting under the cosmos makes you feel very small. The billions of stars and galaxies shining back at you (well not all of them) makes you realize how small and insignificant we all are. It's really beautiful. The way the sun sets with all the orange, yellow, purple, red and grey colors sprawling across the horizon is awe inspiring. The quiet was very peaceful.

Btw I am trying to figure out this new blogger moderator thing (they changed the entire format from my end) and my last post as I was trying to delete spam I accidentally deleted 35 of your comments of which some were there before I left. Thanks for missing me and wanting new posts. We'll see if I can blog like I used to after I catch up with what I missed. Right now I don't know but I do appreciate your comments from when i was gone. That's why I made this post.

Emma Watson is the master of deception and spin

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From snitchseeker.com September 2012, "But Emma hasn’t let that effect her life choices. In 2009 she enrolled at Brown university in the US to study European woman’s history and drama, trying her best to ignore the paparazzi following her around campus, and picked a poignant high-school drama, The Perks of being a Wallflower (see out review page 217) as her first post-potter project."It’s not some wild break away from Harry Potter," She explains from her JFK-bound car in New York. "Because I don’t really want to get away from Harry Potter - I’ve never seen it as shackle."

WHAT SHE SAID THEN: From indianexpress.com Nov 2010, "People keep saying to me, 'So this is the end, how do you feel about it being the end?' And I'm like, 'It really doesn't feel that to me.' It feels like the beginning. It's actually really an exciting time for me rather than this kind of the end. I can't stand everyone calling it the end. I'm 20 years old. Seriously. It feels like I've been handed my life back, like I've been let off a leash," said Watson.

Echee says: Leash and shackle; it's the same thing. They both restrict movement and your abilities to move. I could post more quotes of her saying similar things and saying she loves not having Potter anymore because she was restricted from taking on other project. I think this single quote pretty much sums up she did feel like she was shackled. More quotes click these posts called Emma Watson says being famous is hard and  Emma had no control over her life. Those are just two.

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From usmagazine.com September 2012, "Emma also offered a little insight on her new role in The Perks Of Being A Wallflower, saying it was the realisation she needed that acting is the right career for her - despite 10 years of Potter life. She continued: ‘Making this movie was so pivotal for me because I realised I do really want to be an actress, which wasn’t something I fully knew, since Harry Potter was such a singular experience."

WHAT SHE SAID THEN: From telegraph.co.uk July 2007, "It's the first time I've been anything but Hermione. Pauline is headstrong, so in that way she is quite like Hermione, but she is not academic. In fact, she actually reminds me of myself as a child, much more than Hermione does. Pauline is utterly obsessed with being an actress and I was just like that when I was younger. I dreamt of it. I practised speeches in front of mirrors. Whenever there was a part at school, I went for it. I was probably a bit of a show-off in the sense that any chance to get up and be seen, I did it."

Echee says: Not much to say here. I did a post on this. Emma as usual is lying through her teeth. She's hyping up Perks making it sound dramatic. The fact is she dreamed of being actress as far back as she can remember. Check out the post I did called Emma clarifies her acting dreams for more quotes and bullshit on the part of Emma "stay true an honest as a person and artist" Watson.

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From ewcoffeebreak.wordpress.com September 2012 Glamour magazine, "The problem with a beautiful, intelligent and accomplished young woman like Emma is that, while she suffers from the same vulnerabilities as any girl, there’s no inner torment or dysfunction there for people to pick at. So she keeps calm and carries on, with plans to return to Brown in January ("I made such nice friends there"), and invites her friends to join her on the set of upcoming film Noah in iceland - her destination today - when she gets lonely."

WHAT SHE JUST SAID: From firstpost.com August 2012, London, Aug 18 (IANS) Actress Emma Watson reveals that her initial years at the university “weren’t easy” because she couldn’t spend a lot of time with a solid group of friends. The 22-year-old actress began her studies at Brown University in 2009 and admits that the American establishment was tough. “My first two years at Brown weren’t easy, not because I was bullied or because anyone gave me a particularly hard time, but just because, you know, without the collegiate system… and at Brown everyone does completely different things and very much chooses their own path, which is great, but it’s also much more difficult, too. You’re not with a group of people all the time at one time,” she told T: The New York Times Style Magazine. (First two years? She was there for a year in a half)

Echee says: My God she said something recently in t-magazine that was different. I did not post the quote from this same interview where she was asked if she made friends at Brown and she declined to comment sighting privacy and personal reasons. I have the scan from ONTD. She used to love to talk about her friends from Brown. Well when she was at Brown. I bet these friends are the imaginary type. Aww the poor girl gets lonely. 1 2 3 AWWWWW!! Click here for that post and just go to my University posts on the right screen if you need more input about her lovely time at Brown that is now a dramatic boohoo of a time.

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From glamour.com September 2012 Glamour magazine, "Do you have a stylist? “Yeah, I have to at this point. When I was younger, I used to do it all myself, but I’ve had to get help because it’s gotten to a stage where I can’t show up in my Converses or whatever I bought from High Street."

WHAT SHE SAID THEN: From inquisitr.com March 2012, "The 21-year-old Harry Potter star – who has appeared in advertising campaigns for Burberry in the past, including a billboard campaign alongside her younger brother in 2009 – has always welcomed assistance from stylists but feels it’s the time to start making her own decisions when it comes to "what to wear." Watson explained: "I was fully game for, ‘Throw me in this, throw me in that’ but I’d like to develop my own sense of style and dress for myself.

Echee says: Ok when she was younger she used to do it all by herself and she needs help now. Go to the second quote and she did not do it all herself and she wants to dress for herself. What is the real story and why is it all ass backwards? So complicated but luckily I did posts on this. Emma's stylist is the real fashion icon, Emma Watson fashion icon by association and Emma Watson still using a stylist.

THE LIE: From celebrity-gossip.net September 2012, On not wanting to date another actor: "I try not to. It definitely makes me nervous. I haven’t tried to make others celebrity friends or date people who are in my industry, because it’s difficult and it can be really superficial."

THE TRUTH: Johnny Simmons (runner up: George Craig who acts/performs in music videos)


Echee says: LMFAO and you know not one entertainment media outlet is going, "Wait a moment?! But you dated Johnny Simmons and lied about it. Just like George Craig." I did many posts on this. To sum it up. Started off as a nature walk on location filming Perks, then a bar on location, then the MTV movie awards where it was reported he was stroking her butt and they kissed but it was a bad camera angle. That was after two weeks of filming. Then they were photographed in his home town of Dallas at a night club. Then there was the denial by Emma and her publicist saying they were only friends. Then she was in LA hanging out on his new movie set,  spotted at Kings Crossing in London, a publicity stunt leaked getaway in Paris and then sitting on his lap in NYC in September. One month later she ended up being with her current boyfriend. Wow she had dating issues like for sure. Eh, I did many posts on this. This one should do. Emma found a man not terrified of her. More is under my dating guys posts on the right side with pictures of all I just said.

THE BULLSHIT: From celebrity-gossip.net September 2012 Glamour magazine, "On her physical qualities receiving positive attention as of late: "I was always the smart, nerdy one. People put you in boxes, and that was my box. So it's really nice [the compliments], but looks have never been something that I focused on or that people around me did. But I liked being nerdy one."

THE REALITY: Model for Burberry and Lancome. If she didn't focus on her looks she would have not done any of those things. If she never felt she was pretty she would have never done them and continue in magazine photo shoots. She's been using what she was born with. She's embraced her good looks. First she is an actress. Not a model or anything like that. That came later. She uses her looks with everything she does. The nerdy thing is more Hermione than it is Emma. They put her in that box because she claimed to live in that box. If she was not thought as a pretty little girl by JK Rowling she would have not got the part of Hermione. That is why she was cast. Anytime you pick up an article about her it is always saying how pretty she is. Even her fan fiction interviews that are clearly created by her PR team does this. Her looks have made her life. Her acting sucks. She's overrated because of her looks. If she were not as pretty and looked like a Kelly Osbourne she'd be hosting reality TV shows as well. It's a shallow world we reside. That's how it is. This daft quote in the same interview she's posing with half a boob showing. Emma just STFU please.

MADE ME LAUGH: From celebrity-gossip.net September 2012, "On seeing herself on-screen in 'Perks' as not-Hermione: "It was a pretty emotional experience! I have to say, I cried a lot the first time I watched it."

WHY: When you desperately want rid of something, like she does with the Hermione image, crying is not a emotion one would exhibit while watching it happen. Relief and joy would be the proper emotion. Unless you are a spoiled person that never had to deal with real hardship in life and when you don;t get your way like you normally do you cry. I think that pegs Emma real well. The amount of bullshit in that quote compared to how desperate she's been to shed Hermione is pretty high in such a short quote. I have quotes going back five years of her going it's really going to be hard to shed this image. At the same time as she grew older she's began to preach how modest she is and how upset she gets when photographers put her in sexy outfits in photo shoots. Then you see her in sexy outfits at strip clubs, move sets and photo shoots. She's done nothing but lie about her modesty bullshit. It was a cover to attempt to start sheding that image. She's like a politican about many things. Tells you what you want to hear and then does the opposite. We vote the same idiots in office all the time. Idiots think Emma is a role model. It's the same exact thing.  Eh, I got some modesty bullshit coming on her Glamour shoot I'll save for another post.  In the meantime listen to her talk about crying.

From iheartwatson.net Harper’s Bazaar UK: ‘Good Girl Gone Bad’ – August 2011, "My acting tutor said the hardest thing for me was to get angry. I almost broke down in tears when they tried to get me to be angry" From iheartwatson.net Harper’s Bazaar UK: August 2011, "I read the whole script in one sitting and it made me cry." From iheartwatson.net Seventeen Magazine: August 2011, "So I wouldn’t call, because I didn’t want to cry." From iheartwatson.net Vogue UK: December 2010, "In the end I had a break down. More like uncontrollably crying." From www.iheartwatson.net August 2011, "I read the whole script in one sitting and it made me cry … it deals with the issues that teenagers go through, the real ones, the scary ones that no one really wants to talk about."



From iheartwatson.net The Early Show: November 2005, "It’s funny, I find it easier to cry. But to laugh realistically, when they say laugh on cue, it’s really hard not to make it sound kind of fake."

Echee says: I don't think she cries as much as she says she does. It's a great sympathy ploy for readers. Beautiful girl that cries. Awwwww. She's so sweet. This goes with her modesty quotes and her claim she is shy and not attracted by fame or money. She so addicted to work when the reality is she is addicted to attention. She wants normalcy and anonymity but never stays away long enough to be forgotten, etc, etc. This is why she is the master of deception. Last part of the last quote says, "sound kind of fake" and she surely sounds fake to me. She's the little girl that always cries wolf. I don't believe her on anything she says about herself. Too much confliction, hypocrisy, contradiction and deception. 

I have more coming. This post has to end here. Her body obsession issues where she finally feels comfortable in her thin skin (this was after she dropped the weight she gained after Potter) , the hardest part of fame is people seeing past the hype when all she ever did was whine about anonymity, she does not drink but she's not sensble about it, her graduation talk which is bullshit, her amazement she was spotted at Cochella and her side boob photo shoot to name a few. She talked about her hair once more but I don't know. Like her education bullshit I am tired of posting on her hair cut from over two years ago. I made some of these updates in older posts.

Next week I wont be around. Too much going on. This will probaly be my last post until the following week.

Perks of being a Wallflower turning into the Emma Watson movie

From the-leaky-cauldron.org (Logan Lerman), "She’s great. She’s really a great person and easy to work with and a fantastic actress. [I am] a big fan of Harry Potter. Yeah, it’s really exciting to see her outside of the series and what she’s able to do. She’s not only pulling it off, but she’s blowing people away with her performance."

From ezra-miller.net (Ezra Miller), "I must’ve listened to each of the Jim Dale voice recordings of the Harry Potter books maybe like a couple hundred times each. And that means like putting in the hours everyday, and that’s what I did after school, was just like listen to those books on repeat. You know, here’s what it—here’s what I essentially believe. Here’s what— something that’s very exciting about Emma—truly being such a magical artist— is that, that book strikes a core of human beings all around—all over this world. Those books do for a very specific reason—which is that like, we all feel innately that we are capable of very, very, very wonderful, magical things and that’s not validated in this culture—in this society—and thus the, you know, the ration of people who are actually acting upon these abilities that we have I feel like gets smaller and smaller and—but, you know, the reality is that we have those capabilities and that, you know, Emma—who plays Hermione Granger— has those capabilities as an artist. She is what we look at and say ‘magician.’ [laughs] You know? She is that. So yeah, Harry Potter was important for me but fortunately it’s been—it hasn’t even crossed my mind at any point working with Emma. No, not even for a second because she is quite her own entity"

From mtv.com (Nina Dobrev), "This has been a really great choice for Emma, and the role couldn’t be more perfect for her. It’s different than ‘Harry Potter.’ She’s showing everyone in the world that she’s got a different side of her and that she’s not just this one character. She’s kicking butt and taking names."

From justjaredjr.com (Erin Wilhelmis), "I couldn’t believe I was going to get to meet her [Emma]. She was so sweet and really helped me feel so comfortable on set. My sister literally grew up with the "Harry Potter" books. I remember my dad reading them to her before she knew how to read. She helped me to become a fan, but my sister is the ultimate fan. We both loved the character of Hermione, so it was very exciting to get to work with Emma. But Emma definitely breaks free from Hermione in this film. She is so talented and I can’t wait to watch her in many different roles to come."

From twistmagazine.com (Mae Whitman), "Emma Watson is just awesome! I mean, I’ve been a fan of hers for a long time - before Harry Potter - just her whole career seems great to me. And she’s the best kind of person to be around. Everything about her, she’s very classy and artistic and I just love her!"

Echee says: By reading all these quotes you can tell these are all set up. They are all the same. Emma is great and wonderfully talented, she played Hermione but there is so much more to her as an actress than Hermione, it was a joy to work with her and she's going to kick butt in this movie. Blah blah blah. Yadda yadda yadda. Yackity smackity. This is the Perks of being a Wallflower movie, correct? Not Harry Potter and the Revenge of the Death Eaters, right? They couldn't just let her work speak for itself without bringing up Hermione? You'd have to be just getting out of a 12 year coma not to realize this is not a Harry Potter movie. You'd have to be a complete dickwad magoo to expect Hermione to show up in Perks of being a Wallflower. Clearly this is how they are trying to attract money to the gates.

Emma Watson is such a iconic movie actress that it takes the entire cast to sell it. Did I mention I minored in sarcasm in college? The biggest bullshitter award goes to Ezra Miller. The only thing magical about Emma Watson is she's photogenic fake and flake. The dunce cap goes to Mae Whitman. You were a huge fan of hers before Harry Potter? Ok seems legit, lol. Seriously Mae, Emma had no other movies before Harry Potter. Try again. Unless you were there watching her putting on school plays in Oxford. Emma Watson is that actress who needs people to say good things about her. She does not have the talent to back it up. She needs hype, sensationalism and photography to seem better than she is. Clearly you can tell it's all about Emma Watson as Sam, not Logan Lerman as Charlie or the message this movie is trying to express. They are promoting it as Emma breaks free from Hermione.

From buzzsugar.com August 2012, "My script was covered in notes about all of these American words, American slang. I was quizzing my friends about high school and prom and everything, and then Steve was just like, "Emma, this is great and everything, but you really just need to let all of that go," because he said that he saw me as Sam, and it was kind of as simple as that. I don't know what it was that he saw in me that made him so think that it was me, but when I met with him he had a book — he made a bible of what he wanted all the visuals to look like and everything. And this was before I had even met with him, before I'd accepted, and he had photographs of me all the way through this book with ideas of Sam, [so] I knew he wasn’t bullsh*tting guess [there's] an element of paranoia for me that directors would maybe bring me on because of the huge following Harry Potter has, or for some other reason like that, so it really meant a lot for me to know that there was no one else for this role. That was really nice to know"

Funny this she said there at the end. I've said this more than a few times in various posts on Perks and Bling Ring. We've discussed that. I said this before. It's a little give and take. Emma is getting what she wants even though she said it would be stupid for her to distance herself from Hermione. You can't trust Emma's word anyway. The studious however get what they want. To make a film with limited funding but to profit off it at the box office. Of which they will do since the Harry Potter fan base is going to pay to see Emma in this movie. It's not that Emma has any real power here. The studio heads see the profit margin for this small indie film. The only reason Chbosky's says she's Sam is because Emma will make him money off a small budget. It's business and yes they are using Emma for the Harry Potter fan base but at the same time she is doing a character to help her separate herself from Hermione. Emma realizes this but she's playing an angle on it. Just like MWWM and soon to be Bling Ring, Beauty, and Noah when that comes out. They're all using her. These roles are not major complex ones. Anyone could do them.

From huffingtonpost.com Jan 2011, For a depressing book, this is pretty good news. Last June, Variety reported that 'Harry Potter' star Emma Watson had agreed to star in the big screen adaptation of the teen angst novel 'The Perks of Being a Wallflower.' The only problem was finding some funding, and a production studio. That appears to be solved. New York Magazine reports that Summit Entertainment, best known for its 'Twilight' mega-franchise, is teaming up with another teen idol to bring the film into production. They're in negotiations with the film's backers, New York reports; the book's author, Stephen Chbosky, is slated to direct the film."

From iheartwatson.net September 2012 Glamour magazine, "I also read that you met with studio executives to persuade them to fund Perks. What was that like? "No one wanted to make it at first, because it deals with difficult subject matter, so I basically went out and pitched it to studios myself. It felt very empowering to be able to get something made that I really believed in."

From mtv.com August 2012, "MTV: What were the original meetings like with the cast members? Chbosky: I met them through the audition process — Emma was an offer. I knew she was Sam. That was easy. Logan auditioned and every other person including the adults, every other person auditioned."

Basically Emma never had to audition. Emma was an offer? I am not familiar with behind the scene casting terminology but I would assume this does not mean audition. Has Emma received a role yet where it was based on her talent and not some connection to Harry Potter? I think not. Most actresses have to audition for roles but because Emma was from these Potter movies that has this huge fan base and she has this huge obsessed fans base she doesn't have to right now. She's riding on the coattails of Harry Potter. If Mae Whitman would have been cast as Sam this movie would have went straight to DVD or not even filmed. Get the girl from Harry Potter that has this ridiculous cult like draw and things will happen. Like I said above, this is business. Not about Emma having power.

From iheartwatson.net NovelNovice.com – August 17, 2012, "I really started reading scripts maybe after the fourth Harry Potter movie, around the age of 15, 16. And really didn’t read anything that I really loved instantly. And then, it was almost like, you know, not that I’d lost interest, but my agent was starting to get stressed. Pretty sure, I was kind of ‘Bleh, do I have to read it.’ And then I read The Perks of Being a Wallflower and it was so beautifully written and so funny and so incredibly moved by it, and I just instantly knew that (a) the movie had to be made and (b) that I had to play Sam. I really wanted to play Sam. I was just really drawn to her. And so, then I met with Stephen, who, when I met with Stephen, we just instantly clicked and I felt like I was meeting an old friend. And then I met Logan, and I knew he was the perfect Charlie."

Replace the words with Harry Potter and Harry it sounds like she is describing Hermione and Daniel Radcliffe. In fact she called Radcliffe the perfect Harry and said once she was waiting on a role she felt as strong as she did with Hermione. She was said to have been the perfect Hermione. Above she says Chobsky said she was Sam to him. This sounds like a Harry Potter quote from years ago. So she waited on Perks, eh? Well not really. There was another movie she was wanted to make but it never materialized. It was called Napoleon and Betsy. Here are two quotes from her on that movie.

From iheartwatson.net February 2009 "It’s a strong relationship but it’s not sexual. It’s very complex. A touching of souls. She was a very young girl and he was this older, incredible man. I read the script two years ago and just knew this was the perfect film for me." From iheartwatson.net EmmaWatson.com: 2010 "It’s a project I love and am attached to, but I don’t know if or when it will happen. I hope it does. I’m afraid that’s the nature of film making. You learn to not become too emotionally involved as scripts come and go and many of them never get off the ground."

From movienight.mtv.ca August 2012, "During Emma Watson’s tenure as the leading lady of the “Harry Potter” franchise, she rarely stepped out to work on other projects. As the series neared its end, instead of trying to prove how grown-up she was in film, she headed to Brown University and then later Oxford before settling back into life in Hollywood.“I think at first I didn’t because I was always either studying or filming, I didn’t have time to go off and do other films or other things to sort of show people that, ‘Oh, she is not just Hermione, she is an actress and she can go and do these other parts and roles.’ … I didn’t, because I was so focused on, you know, on my GCSEs and on my AS and on my A-levels and then getting in to university and then whatever, I didn’t really have time to do any of that,” she says in the new issue of T Magazine. So, as she moves farther and farther away from life as Hermione, she is inching closer and closer to films that include no magic and lots of drama. “I guess, weirdly in my head, I knew what I wanted. I didn’t know how it would or if it would ever happen,” she explained before breaking down her spate of upcoming film roles. Of the highly anticipated “Perks of Being a Wallflower,” Watson opened up to MTV News about her reasons for joining the indie film based on the book of the same name. “I feel like I’ve been waiting for ‘Perks.’ I was waiting for this story, this script, this moment,” she explained, when we visited her on set. “I was a huge ‘Harry Potter’ fan even before I did the movies, and I thought I would never find a character or material I care about so deeply and personally as I did that, and then this came along and completely swept it all.”

So what she said about her GSCE is not really true at all. Maybe she was working for them but she also was trying to get roles. She is making it sound like she was not interested and was too busy when she obviously tried. She waited for Perks? She said it would be her worst nightmare to play a rebellious teenager. Ah this is bullshit. Perks probably had the only script that put her the farthest away from Hermione so she took it. Another thing she said she would never do. She said she would not be so tactful and it would be stupid. Yet her eshe is doing all these things. Also what she said about starting to read scripts at 16 or 17 with never reading anything she loved instantly is not true. She loved Napoleon and Betsy and let's not forget Ballet Shoes

From glamourvanity.com 2007, “I was all set to go back to school after finishing Harry Potter [and the Order of the Phoenix] but couldn’t resist Ballet Shoes. I really loved it.” “I always had concerns that I was Hermione because I looked like a Hermione – but what else did I bring? So this was the test. And it worked. Ballet Shoes was a small production, but it gave me the confidence to think I could actually have a career as an actress after the Harry Potter films. That I wouldn’t just always be Hermione.”

About these scripts she speaks of. The one similarity is she was begged to do movies. I always felt this was strange. If she was a sought after in demand actress as her fans love to say then why was she getting bad scripts and why would anyone have to beg her to do roles? In Ballet Shoes, MWWM and Perks (click this link regarding no more teen roles) she was begged to do those roles. Although for Bling Ring she said she met Sophie Coppala before she knew of Bling Ring. I really get a sense she was typecast hard and this too was another angle to make it look like she wasn't. I think she had to sell out and now sells sex to even have a career in the first place. I said almost a year ago that's what she'll have to do. Emma is a proclaimed perfectionist, quite high up on herself and has this ability to play things down when she is really hyping them up. So it's pretty plausible to me this might be the case. She's all about image anyway.

From emma-watson.net, June 2011, "Although Ms. Watson, now 21, was dead set against more high school roles, her agent pressed the script on her, and the actress fell in love with it. "Once she and I met, we both knew in each other we had a kindred spirit," Mr. Chbosky (author of book and director of movie) says. In January, she made the rounds at studios to plead the case for "Perks." Summit Entertainment, the studio behind Twilight

From collider.com Nov 2010, "Was it hard to say yes to the role or was it so easy? "I was coming back on the train from Paris having just done a photo shoot and I was exhausted and the last thing I wanted to do was read a script. And my agent called me up and was like "please just read the script, you won’t regret it, please just read it." I so didn’t want to, and the minute I opened it up I couldn’t put it down. And the part was small but really interesting and had like a really good character arc and was really well formed even though it had a few scenes. And I called her straight back and was like "yes alright you were right. I’m in I’m in I’m in." So it was nice. Yeah I was offered the part so that was amazing."

From telegraph.co.uk Dec 2007, "Emma Watson famous as Hermione Granger in the films is to star in BBC1 new adaptation as Pauline, the eldest Fossil. She says she only took the role because is also a favourite of JK Rowling. "Jo said, You have to take the part, just for my sake", says Watson."

 

Emma Watson read the script before the book so she says

From buzzsugar.com August 2012, "Have you read the book, and do you feel pressure to live up to it? I read the script first and then I read the book. It was so funny because I read the script and I came back to Brown and I told my roommates that I've just read this amazing script, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, and my friends were like, "Oh, that's my favorite book. So jealous that you get to play Sam. If I was ever going to be in a movie, if I was ever going to play any character ever, it would be Sam."

WHAT JOHNNY SIMMONS SAYS: (ex-boyfriend and castemate in Perks) From eonline.com June 2012, "She read the book and became obsessed with it," said Simmons, 25. "She heard they were making the movie and approached them about it. We wouldn't be here if it wasn't for her."

Echee says: First off talk about being pretentious in her description on reading the script first. With Emma's history of not telling the truth about certain things, her hypocrisy and contradictions I believe Johnny Simmons take on it. He woud know to since he was part of the cast and that's the reason he was able to date her. Why would he lie? I guess he was out of the loop on what lies to tell since he must not talk to her anymore.

The "We wouldn't be here if it wasn't for her" crap I talked about this before. He's talking about her quote from last year when she said she is the one that made Perks happen. I already touched upon this. I will again in another Perks posts with her recent quote saying she was paranoid they were using her for Harry Potter. I was taken aback she said that since I've been saying it for a year. Her fans will pay money big time. Studious know this.

I have this strange feeling she is about to unleash some serious bullshit in her new Glamour magazine interview.

Shortest post ever

PRINT THAT!!
 

Emma Watson lied about not drinking at Brown

THE TRUTH: From etcanada.com August 2012, "Emma takes a cue from Sam, who she calls "the world’s best flirt" and "very fun," buy relishing in her college experience at Brown University: "I have played Beer Pong, I have been to a frat party. It’s been an adventure!"



THE LIE: From jsyk.com Nov 2010 "And I didn't drink last year at Brown, either, because I was underage in America and it would have been disrespectful."

THE PRIOR KNOWLEDGE: From ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com 2008 Q: You begin university next year. In what ways do you expect your life to change?, "It's a big step, it really is. It's a very exciting time of my life because I'm 18 now so I'm kind of an adult, although I don't think I am in the US because you have to be 21 to drink and stuff like that.

THE PRIOR UNOFFICIAL ADMITTANCE: From uni.ae June 2011.(Older interview from the fall of 2010 but dated for June; peculiar?) "How difficult is it to look at a so called normal life cause everybody knows who you are? The idea of sitting around in my dorm having a glass of wine and some pizza is really exciting to me."

THE BULLSHIT: From huffingtonpost.COM May 5^th 2010 she recalls thinking at first, during freshman week. "I was like, I must be mad. Why am I doing this?" And what was with all the party-hearty stuff? She nervously attended her first frat party, hoping she might get into the swing of things. "I felt like I'd walked into an American teen movie. I picked up the red cups. I was like, Wow, they really do drink from these."

Echee says: I could careless about any form of underage drinking. I could also careless that Emma drank when she was not of legal age in the US. Drinking age is different in the UK. It's a different system. It's actually a different culture. The UK is more reserved about alcohol when the US is uptight. Even though she was legal in the UK she is not in the US. The legal drinking age is 21.

Any other time I would not see a huge problem with it. If you drink responsibility who cares? However what I am not cool about is Emma lying about it. I'm not cool with the fact she can portray herself as this goody too shoes that follows the rules. Emma did not attend Brown when she was 21. The spring of 2011 she deferred for Perks and Lancome. She would have not turned 21 until April 2011. She was not even at Brown. She did not start back up at school until the fall of 2011 in Oxford. Why even bring it up or talk about underage drinking if it isn't true in the first place? She says these things so you will like her and people generally do because of it. Emma Watson is most nearly bullshit in everything she says about herself. You might as well like her looks and ignore what she says. Ironically that's what most people generally do. They are too busy saying how perfect and flawless she is. Emma is the typical case of pretty girl that lies and gets away with it. This is more lies coming from "be honest, have nothing to hide or lose and stay true to yourself" Herwhinie "Miss Preach Alot" Grainger.

REMEMBER THIS: From latimesblogs.latimes.com, "Sensing that line of inquiry would get him nowhere, Letterman changed tactics. "Do you drink at all? Do you use controlled substances?" Watson struggled to find the right answer. "We drink at 18 [in the UK]. I'm actually legal to drink here now. It's worth mentioning, I'm 21." (I'm guessing Watson has to remind people that she's not 12 anymore on a regular basis). Letterman pressed her. "What happened? Did you have a shot of something? You either did and you liked it, or you did and you didn't like it. "Watson's discomfort was palpable. "I'm dying here. Can we move on?" she begged. His target weakened, Letterman fired a direct shot. "Let me help. Have you ever had anything to drink?" And that was it: Watson waved the white flag of surrender. "Yes, I have. I got very very drunk once in my life, as everyone does," she declared. "I got drunk! I have been drunk! I'll bow to that!"

I wonder if she ever did drugs or currently does them?

From examiner.com Jan 2010, "I'd be too frightened to take drugs," she said in the past. "I have enough in my life without looking for something else, and I hope that will always be the case."

Related posts with more quotes

Emma doesn't like to party or drink so she says
Emma got drunk "once" so she says
Emma can drink like sailor so she says

Check out my other posts labled "Emma's deceptions" on the right side of this page.
 

Emma Watson sent bibles and supports CAMFED

From indiatimes.com August 25th 2012, "Harry Potter" actress Emma Watson has shown her support for a charity supplying vital equipment to schools in Sub-Saharan Africa. Back to school Shop work to raise funds for education supplies including stationery and uniforms, as well as six-month or one-year bursaries for impoverished students in the region, reports express. Watson, who showed her support for good causes in 2009 by launching her own ethical clothing range in aid of fair trade fashion charity People Tree, has thrown her weight behind the campaign. "Please help CAMFED with their campaign to give that one thing their students need to go to school," the 22-year-old tweeted Thursday."

Echee says: Emma sent a tweet out in the beginning of June saying her planned trip to Zambia had been cancelled due to work commitments. In that time up to the beginning of this month (August) when her small role in the movie Noah starting filming she did nothing but walk a pink dog to being photographed at NYC restaurants to finally being seen at a beach house in the Hampton's. The only thing she did that was work related was a 10 second Olympic spots for the London game. I covered this. First link below goes into better detail. Why they are even bringing up People Tree is beyond me. That one was a flop because she did not put her heart and soul into as much as she spoke about it.

Emma Watson's Camfed trip cancelled
Emma sunbathes in her underwear
Emma's pink dog outrage
What is an Emma Watson loon?
Emma's People Tree line flops
Emma's People Tree line reduced by 60 percent

This should be changed to "Why we are tricked by Emma"



She tweeted about Camfed. So the fuck what? Why is it all celebrities have to do is say they support a cause and people are all like, "Oh wow that is just so awesome of them and blah blah blah." Seriously how about a little action with all the talk? Would be fucking nice don't you think?

From entertainmentwise.com August 25th 2012, "Although Emma Watson may no longer be a student at Hogwarts, it seems that there's still no shortage of reading material at Em's house, as fans have taken it upon themselves to send her Bibles...out of all the gifts? Really? The actress received copies of The Bible whilst starring in the Harry Potter films, because fans thought that 'she needed to be guided', apparently. According to The Sun, Emma said: "Finding our 'Harry Potter' films un-Christian, people think I need to be guided and send me The Bible. I now have a collection of 20." Well at least you had some form of entertainment in between takes, Em..."

Echee says: This quote is from five years ago. She did not say this recently. To me is has no relevance unless she said something similar present day or there is a long list of the same types of quotes and then one where she completely flip flops on it. I watched her in a video say this for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix from 2007. #factcheckingtakesfiveminutes

I love how the entertainment media is able to pull out older non relevant quotes that I believe is a correlation of some sort with the biblical movie Noah she is currently filming. I am not sure since she is back in London. She was only in Iceland for a few weeks. Her role must be very small. However they can't pull up more relevant quotes when Emma makes claims like she would never wear mini dresses, doesn't get her flash out out, couldn't get her ear pierced until after Potter, doesn't go clubbing and she does not wear big sunglasses or carry designer hand bags, her education or charity bullshit, etc, etc, etc, (the short list) when there are loads of photos that say otherwise. They don't report her contradicting quotes or her hypocrisy. Even when she lies like she did with George Craig and Johnny Simmons, etc, etc, (another short list) we got nothing. They don't call her out on any of it. They keep on portraying her as this innocent and honest English rose. They keep on reporting said truths of Emma that are not.  

The news must be very slow to post a quote from five years ago and report a celebrities tweet. I wonder if the reason why the media treats her with kids gloves in because her father is one of the worlds top five telecommunications lawyers?

New candid of Emma in the UK from yesterday



From iheartwatson.net Oct 2011 (Elle magazine), "“My problem is I’m a bit boring really,” she says, with the hint of a smile. “That’s why the tabloids feel the need to make up more interesting stuff. The way I choose to look when I’m not doing something public is very specific. I don’t carry around designer bags, I don’t wear big sunglasses. I’m not comfortable being the centre of attention. When I’m not working, when I’m not being Emma Watson (???), I’m just trying not to stand out.”

Click this post I did on "big sunglasses and designer hand bags. I guess she's not being Emma Watson again. I wonder who she is being in this photo. Is it one of her characters she says she plays in photo shoots? I know, I know, right? How do we know it's a designer hand bag? Yeah you're right it's a hand me down from her Grandma, lol. Nothing is cheap on this girl. Those white shorts she was photographed in the Hamptions has a retail price of 70 American dollars. This outfit she has on is not cheap even though it may look like it. And none of it is People Tree by the way.

Just for shits and giggles

1.)Hey look Emma with that Pink dog from last spring. So wonder they thought it was her dog because when does her friend Sophie (on right; owner of dog) get in the news?
2.) Hey Emma in 2008 with big singlasses and look her ears are pierced. She said she had to want until after Harry Potter.



Hey there is Emma and that dog again which is not hers but I can see how people might think it is. But hey no "big sunglasses or a designer hand bag" as far as I can tell. I guess she is being Emma here. Look at that happy face Emma is sporting. The girl never looks like she smells a fart to be honest.



The comments on dailymail.co.uk are oddly ripping her a new one. Her fans must be a sleep because they jump on DM for every positive and negative article about her.




 

Emma Watson's t-magazine interview not accepted by her fans

Taking a little break from the usual type of posts

From whiteflagwandering.tumblr.com

It was difficult not to swear at my computer scream as I read the NY Times article feature on Emma Watson. I would love to write a thorough and blasting criticism of the utterly pompous and ignorant critic who Emma Watson had to unfortunately breathe next to, but I was supposed to be in bed an hour and a half ago.

So, this’ll have to do. Here are three reasons why Will Self of the New York Times is an idiot.

1. For whatever reason, Self has swallowed the idea that the Harry Potter books are on level with Captain Underpants, even though he has never read them, or bothered to observe that Rowling’s books have been translated into 67 languages, are the best selling books worldwide, and that the last four books of the series are the fastest selling books in all of history. If he was going for the intellectual snob approach, he nearly nailed it- just drop the intellectual part.

2. He seized every possible chance to present Watson as an unordinary

3. He openly admitted that he completely ignored her when she spoke of her film roles. It is his damn job to listen to every word that she says. We do not care what he thinks. We care about what Watson thinks. That’s why her photo was taken multiple times, and why, thankfully, a photo of "a downright cranky half-centenarian" was not.

Echee says: Last year's Vogue interview was way worse. Not because of the writer but because of her whining about having no control of a life. How it was written was even worse. Lines like these:

"It’s the pixie-cut hair and flawless skin that give her away. Emma Watson is dressed unobtrusively in a cotton flower-print French Connection dress and beige sandals, but she is unmistakable"

"Emma ignores the stares and continues to chat animatedly about Miró’s willingness to take risks with his art. An avid painter herself—“I love it and have a need to do it”—she can talk eloquently about every picture on the wall. Her favorite is The Farm, a painting once owned by Ernest Hemingway that brought the artist his first taste of success outside Spain. What she admires, Emma tells me, is that Miró was both a draftsman and a painter, unafraid to combine these talents to create something that was simultaneously surreal and hyperreal."

"As Emma takes me on a tour of her house, the extraordinary depth and breadth to her talents become obvious. Every room is framed around a beautiful artifact—a piece of furniture or fabric picked up at a flea market in Paris or Los Angeles—and her artworks show that she can both paint and draw exquisitely."

Click that link to read about a spoiled little brat as one person who commented had to say. It was not a popular interview for Emma. It was not even put on her official website because of that. It was her first post Potter interview and she tanked it. I used a few websites in my media posts that had people ripping her for sounding like an ungrateful ingrate.

The Vogue article is not as bad as the Sunday Style Times that was also from last year. Check out these lines;  

"Suddenly, she’s coming towards me, tiny and superpretty in Azzaro. She could easily pass for 15, even in make-up. She shakes my hand and keeps hold of it sweetly, like an anchor. For someone who’s been doing this for years, the nerves still flicker about her face. Her palm is endearingly clammy. "You’re doing well," I say. "Oh, gosh, I hope so. Look at all this." She marvels at the stage, the cameras, the champagne-rinsed crowd, her name in enormous neon letters. She looks pleased — and ever so slightly scared"

"I immediately understood the sense of responsibility. My brother says I’m an eager beaver. It’s true. I’m very driven Bingo. Watson’s addiction isn’t to celebrity, obviously. It’s to self-betterment, to doing the "right thing". She is the definition of propriety, so when offers flooded in while she was at uni, she realised it would be a mistake not to maximise on her moment."

"No wonder. Still, hearing her natter on, you can’t help thinking she’d make someone a fantastic girlfriend. Loyal, hard-working, polite to a fault — and, let’s not forget, with some serious dough in the bank. She also, rather Britishly, downplays her fame, the reasons it exists and what it means to her"

Her fans would appreciate the Sunday Sttyle Times a lot better. It's written like fan fiction. It's something someone would make up on tumblr, wordpress or blogger. It made me a puke a little. It's something they are accustomed to. There minds work that way when they think about her because those are the types of interviews she normally has. It kisses her ass and makes her out as the most perfect innocent thing you'd ever see.

To get back to this New York Times t-magazine interview. It's a bit long in the tooth so I can't highlight all but there is the begining that struck me. It's different for a Emma Watson interview where the writer kisses her ass the entire time.

"Emma Watson, the onetime co-star of the most successful movie franchise ever, is a very grateful and a very lucky person. How do I know that? Because I sat down with the 22-year-old in a gastropub in a trendy neighborhood of North London, and in the course of an hour’s conversation she said "grateful" five times and "lucky" eight. True, of those five "grateful"s two were of the "ungrateful" form — yet these were embedded in clauses like "I felt guilty because I felt like that meant I was ungrateful. . . ." So, as you can see, Watson is a young woman who wants it put firmly on the record that she understands human lives are shaken up in the snow globe of uncertainty, and that simply because she’s ended up being covered in golden flakes, she doesn’t take it as her due, oh, no."

"I can’t say I ever paid that much attention to her acting in the Potter movies, but I’ve looked for many, many hours in the general direction of screens upon which Watson has performed spells, mixed potions, ridden magical beasts and generally cavorted about. With four children of my own, ranged over 11 years, the eldest the same age as the actress, and the youngest just 11, I’ve been exposed to a great deal more of the franchise than I would’ve wished."

"So, Watson will always be, for me, a nice middle-class English girl pretending to be another nice middle-class English girl who’s lucky enough to have magical powers for which she’s extremely grateful. That off-screen those magical powers consist of the ability to transform cavorting about into huge mounds of gold — her personal fortune is estimated at $40 million — only goes to prove that we live in a world at least as strange as J. K. Rowling’s fictions"

"I concede the above has been lightly purged of “like”s (although meanly I left the “just”s and the “really”s), those nonce words so crucial to the speech patterns of any Mid-Atlantean under 30, but it does give a fair flavor of Watson’s earnestness and dedication as an actress."

"Watson did talk to me a little about her roles, but I simply can’t hear actors when they speak about their work — the world around me grows sort of misty, and often I swoon away altogether. A famous Shakespearean actor was once talking to me over lunch about his Lear, and I very nearly put my eye out with the top of the pepper grinder"

"Nowadays Emma Watson is set to make a lot more lemonade, and as I left her I thought: I damn well hope it’s potable — then checked myself. After all, why does it matter to me? Unlike with her earlier screen incarnation, I will not be compelled by my children to witness these ones. No, I can decide to watch her movies or not, as I choose, just as she has chosen to become a real grown-up actress. And that, surely, is what cinematic art should be: an act between consenting adults."

If you read the article in a whole the writer does say some really nice things about her. They correlate a few things to make the reader think about it. The Emma loons are only focusing on these few negative tidbits I highlighted. They are always like that. It's like they have OCD and found one hair out of place. It drives them insane. But to the rest of us we don't even notice there is a hair out of place. They want to read stuff similar to the Sunday Style Times or any other related article or interview that is written like fan fiction. Reading this interview was the equivalent of them drinking out of a cup that had chewing tobacco spit thinking it was tea. It shocked and disgusted them.

Do you feel like the guy (Emma loon) who wrote that critique about this interview on his tumblr? What's your take on her interviews? Do you find them annoying with being over the top and scripted? Do you think her PR team and the writer have a plan on how it will be written? What do you think of the t-magazine interview? Do you think the writer has something against her or are the Emma loons reading too much into it because it's not formatted to praise her like a God? Click all the few magazine interview links I provided and tell me which one is fan fiction and which one is real journalism.

I thought this was interesting when I came across it. Are people finally breaking out from their trance to see the woman behind the mask?

whatdoestheinternetthink.net

Rupert Grint is %90 positive
Daniel Radcliffe is %70 negative
Rob Pattison is %87 positive
Jennifer Lawrence is %97 positive
Emma Stone is %94 positive
Kristen Stewart is %66 negative.


 

Emma Watson can't go to a museum or take the bus - OH THE HUMANITY!

This was originally in my last post titled Emma Watson: pretentious as usual and deceiving about Brown as Del Toro .... Check that out for the post and to read all the comments. I added a few new things to it. That post is a bit long to begin with. I am making this it's own post because her comments on this is being played real well in the media as a woe is me poor Emma moment. Like seriously #factcheckingtakesfiveminutes. 

From celebrities.ninemsn.comAugust 2012, “Emma Watson is buckling under the weight of a first world problem— she’s too popular for her own good. The actress revealed her woes in an interview with T, The New York Times’ style lift-out, which also features a blown-up face shot of Emma on the cover. "If I went somewhere busy, I wouldn’t last very long. I can’t go to a museum, I’ll last 10 or 15 minutes in a museum," she sobbed. "The problem is that when one person asks for a photograph, then someone sees a flash go off, then everyone else sort of …it’s sort of like a domino effect. "And then very quickly the situation starts to get out of control to a point where I can’t manage it on my own," said the 22-year-old. The thing is, Emma, when you’ve appeared in seven Harry Potter films and a bunch of other successful flicks, regularly lend your face to magazine covers and advertisements and try to become a famous actress, chances are you’ll probably become, err, a famous actress!" AWESOME because I've said this for far too long

Few comments from this website

While I do like Emma I think she is exaggerating a bit about how much media attention she gets. Yes, she is fairly famous but in retrospect to other celebrities like Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton etc she is hardly photographed. Emma is making it seem like she's the most photographed celebrity when I actually think she keeps her personal life out of the tabloids pretty well considering her level of success. She is not to famous to go out in public. Michael Jackson was too famous to go out in public and Princess Diana was. They couldn't walk a step in public without paps and fans mobbing them. Emma doesn't get that.

Get over Yourself lovey... You made your bed so lie in it !!! You sound like a 10 year old winging about their play lunch that everyone wants !!

It's difficult because on one side you feel sorry for them but then you think about how much money she has at such a young age. If she quit acting tomorrow she would still have a wonderful life with all of the finest things...and she is only an actor. Just this week we have seen someone like Julian Assange who has put his life on the line for something he truly believes will advance the human race, and what does he get for it? Not fame, not money, but the threat of extradition to the US for espionage; a trial; definitely jail time and can be put to death! There are people in Hollywood who have committed far greater crimes than Assange and get paid millions of dollars to do it. I just struggle to feel too sorry for these people. Her lavish lifestyle should more than compensate for her loss of public anonymity, that’s the trade off right?....Just saying...you know?

The tragedy of being beautiful and filthy rich. sigh.

Echee says: Well there are people in Africa that are not able to feed their stomachs. This is from precursor of the museum talk in the actual interview that lead to the above quote. From NYT t-magazine interview August 2012, "I was also touched by Watson’s tales of coming to realize the horrific extent of her face recognition as a child star. She told me that up until she was 15 or 16 she still took the bus from Oxford to London, determined to be just an ordinary girl — this was her strange form of rebellion — but that it became too much when everyone on the bus was either talking about or at her." Then it goes straight into that comment about museums. It was her rebellion? She said she never felt the need to rebel. You are wrong, sir! From ctv.ca November 2010, "I do things in my own way, but I've never felt any need to rebel. To be honest I had to much freedom." See I told you. Don't write things you know nothing about. From wwd.com Nov 2010, Fashion was my rebellion.” Aww shit I am confused again. Sorry sir for my sanctimonious scolding. But I must continue. The show must go on! <-- Look exclamation points. Inside joke from the comment section.

Can't ride the bus, eh? At 15 or 16 you had a rough experience, eh? Well maybe or maybe not (click link below). I honestly can't tell you or even come to a conclusion to the real truth if it's now or then. She has too many conflicting stories. Why now? The point being? I hate to post these two quotes again but it goes with her new story. From splashnewsonline.com Dec 2010 "The 20-year-old Harry Potter actress told British newspaper Metro: "The funny thing is people look at me and go: ‘Is that the girl from Harry Potter?’ And then they shake their heads and say: ‘No, it can’t be, she’s on public transport.’ And I’m sat there secretly thinking: ‘Ha Ha that’s funny. The last quote was after Burberry and at the end of Potter. This was reworded quote from two years earlier. Why she repeats it I don't know. From makeushot.commakeushot.com Dec 2008, "I have a more normal life than people expect. When I take public transport, people are like, ‘That girl looks like the girl from ‘Harry Potter,’ but it can’t be her on the train’. I get stopped by people, but that’s fine." Here is what she said last year about fame. She seemed pretty cool with it. So what the fuck is she whining about? From iheartwatson.net Nov 2011, "So many people must wish they were in his position and think that he has the best life, but actually… there are prices you pay. Don’t interpret that from my perspective; it’s not so bad for me. I’m not in Rob’s (Pattison) position, I don’t have people screaming and crying and clawing at me. I’m so grateful for that.” Above  she says, "I went somewhere busy, I wouldn’t last very long. I can’t go to a museum, I’ll last 10 or 15 minutes in a museum." I am having that confused moment again. Wait, maybe it's her not me? I think she was hit with the obliviate curse. You can read more of her quotes on fame below (of which she flips and flop on this subject) in links I provide from past posts of mine. Last year she said this. From fashion.telegraph.co.uk Jan 2012 "Someone asked me why I accepted this job, as I wanted to stand in the shadows. Actually, I gave up the idea that I could become anonymous again!" So what is she bitching about if she gave up the idea of being anonymous? She understand she never can if she continues being a famous actress.

Why do celebrities feel the need to whine about their lives when what they have is so much more than the rest of us no matter if you are working a blue collar job struggling or trying to survive in some mud hut. She works 15 weeks a year on a movie, banks millions and the rest is her leisure time while the rest of us are stuck with the daily grind of 365 days a year. That's not including the bank she makes from the likes of Burberry and Lancome. Get your head out of your ass Herwhinie Granger. Must I explain this any further. Sure there are annoyances I take it. I'm not even famous but I can comprehend certain moments in my head that would bother me. But from where I am sitting, even though I would never want to be famous, the pluses out weigh the minuses. Those moments that would bother me would make me realize how fucking rich and easy my life truly is. I'd say, "Well it sucks sometimes when I just want to eat a burger at my favorite restaurant but I got it made so I'll send one of my slaves out for the burger before I go on my tenth exotic vacation this year." I'm not going to go to magazines whining about it. Hmm millions of dollars boo hoo or unemployment line yay? I don't think those people looking for a job are going to feel sorry for me. That's how I see it. No one wants to hear this kind of stuff. What does this have to do with your up coming movies or projects? I thought she was a private person anyway? Isn't this private information? Is there anyone in Emma's camp that can sit her down and explain to her the reality of her situation, please? Or is she that dense or difficult? You know how she at least has a choice about her life when others are stuck in theres. Take the "slums of Bangledesh" for instance.

Emma is the one that made her name much bigger with attaching herself to international brands such as Burrberry and Lancome. Not everyone is a Potter fan. She expanded her fan base outside of acting. Not everyone watches movies. Wants anonymity and normacly and then signs huge modeling contracts. What the fuck is up with that? Then we have the countless magazines she's done over the years that spread out all over the world promoting herself more than the films. College was supposed to take care of this but she chose more fame, money and attention. That's why she left Brown and Worcester. Now she lives in America and is trying to become a big name there. Oh my, lol. What a maroon. No one is forcing her to stay in the spotlight. She has the money to walk away from it all to live a normal life. In time she will be forgotten like so many other young stars that never hit it big after their initial success. I've never heard anyone with as much as she has find something to whine about. She's old enough to make big girl decisions. Either quit yer bitching and deal with your choice you made or get the hell out of the business and take your little wand to.

Check this out lettersofnote.com. This letter should be re-written and sent to Emma Watson. Because like this letter points out Emma too wanted to be an actress at a young age. What are her interviews going to be like 5 years from now. I can only imagine. This is either her craving for an out pouring of sympathy like the attention whore she is or sometime in the near future she will have a Britney Spears breakdown.



From thesun.co.uk (comments to their article on her whining about fame)

Emma Watson - People like you really make me sick. do you really think you are? You were a little actress in a film and now you think the world revolves around your feet..... REALITY CHECK - You're not all that. You decided to go into acting. I don't suppose for one minute you were dragged kicking and screaming. I suggest now HP is over, you go and get a life.

If Prince William managed it, you can luv !!!

At what point am I suppose to shed a tear and say "oh poor you". If you don't want the fame/attention (not to mention the millions), then get out of the biz. I cannot stand when celebrities start to whine about how they can't go anywhere etc because they are so famous/popular. Guess what? That's the price you pay for being an entertainer - it goes with the job I'm sorry to say so just stop the complaining and suck it up OR get out of the business.

the girl needs a reality check when you take the money for what you do, you have to expect the public will want a piece of you im sure with $70 million you can live with it im sure

She has the personality of a lampost, been pampered to much at a young age, be thankful for what you have.

Tell you what , Emma, give me half your money. It might make things much better for both of us.

God!!! actors,sport stars,models etc are a weird bunch.They do everything bar murder to become rich and famous and when they do they bitch about it.With regard to this stuck up little madam my all time fav Harry Potter movie line was when Snape called her "an insufferable little know it all"With regard to fame if your happy enough to take the money and the lavish lifestyle then take the baggage that comes with it.If you don't like the rules of the game don't step onto the bloody field

I don't think i'd spot her in public in a million years, apart from being in harry potter which i have never seen what else has she done or is she only mobbed by children?

Is it really that everytime she opens her mouth she says something annoying, or is it just that the annoying things are the only ones that hit the news. Either way, if she stopped saying stupid things, they'd stop appearing!

I'm amazed she can manage to squeeze that big head of hers through the front door to go out in the first place!! Get over yourself luv, personally I could be standing next to her and wouldn't notice!! What a pretentious little girl!!!

she always seems to come across as a toffy nosed cow there are more famous people than her who have lives and go out in public
She complains about being famous , really ? How can being rich , famous , anything at the snap of your fingers be a burden ?

Oh.dear!!.she.wanted.to.be.famous.and.now.she.is.
it,s.the.poor.little.me.game!!!
(I.WOULD,NT.RECOGNISE.HER)

Related posts

Emma doesn't know anonymity or total freedom (post from a week ago)
Emma Watson says being famous is hard (maybe or maybe not I ask above)
Emma Watson was in denial about her fame (Blames her fame for leaving Brown; not Perks or Lancome)
Emma Watson, "I gave up the idea of having anonymity"
Tom Felton helped Emma with her fame
Emma Watson is filthy rich
Emma blames the WB for her troubled life